Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Monday, July 6, 2009
Sit down and talk it out
I say, this is hitting the 'self-righteous' on the head with a nail… ooopppsss! I mean hitting the nail right on the head of the 'self-righteous'! Errhh… Whatever, this is hitting the point right home. Kudos! ---------- You can't force people to care; neither should those in need be rude about it Letter from Esther Lim THERE has been much debate over the issue of giving up of seats on the MRT to those who are in need. In trying to encourage social graciousness and compassion, let's not forget that nobody owes anybody anything. It's not wrong to be hopeful, but I'm not sure you should expect someone to give up his seat for you when needed. It is simply impossible to command someone to be compassionate. It has to come from the heart. Why can't someone who's entitled to a seat sit comfortably? Why is he expected to be on a constant lookout for anyone who needs a seat more than him? If that's the case, I would rather stand at a cozy corner and do whatever I choose instead of being seated, lest I be judged for not offering my seat because I was too engrossed in my book or taking forty winks. Social graciousness is also about being tolerant, understanding and less judgmental of those who do not appear to have lived up to expected norms. I do not think it right for someone full of righteous indignation to fulfil his personal need to do good, regardless of whether the situation warrants it, such as by demanding that someone give up his seat for someone else. Perhaps the three groups - the needy, the passive commuters and the self-righteous - should strive to come to a common understanding. The needy can be hopeful but should treat kindness as a privilege, not an obligation. Commuters should be encouraged, and not pressured or made to feel obligated or be judged. The self-righteous should exercise discretion when deciding whether the situation truly warrants their interference, bearing in mind that their interference does not make them any more compassionate than those whom they victimised. Someone who is silently enduring a bad case of migraine might well need a seat more than a pregnant woman in her second trimester carrying a few shopping bags and chatting merrily on her mobile phone. From TODAY, Voices – Monday, 06-Jul-2009; see the source article here.
Posted by PrfyVdlx at 1:51 AM
Labels: Conditions and Diseases, Headache, Health, Migraine, Mobile phone, Neurological Disorders, Pregnancy, Shopping comments (0)
Monday, June 15, 2009
19 arrested for suspected loansharking activities in islandwide raid
By Channel NewsAsia | Posted: 15 June 2009 2042 hrs
SINGAPORE: Police have arrested 19 people for suspected involvement in a loansharking syndicate, making this the largest number of loansharking-related arrests resulting from a single operation this year.
18 men and a woman, aged between 19 and 40 years old, were taken into custody following an island-wide operation early Monday morning,
Officers from the Criminal Investigation Department and the Police Intelligence Department raided various locations and seized more than S$35,000 in cash.
Other items seized included computers, mobile phones, storage media and suspected debtor records.
Police said preliminary investigations indicate that the loansharking syndicate was also involved in loanshark-related harassment in connection with the illegal loans.
First-time offenders found guilty of operating a business as an unlicensed moneylender may be fined at least S$20,000 and up to S$200,000, jailed a maximum of two years, or both.
Repeat offenders face mandatory imprisonment of up to five years, including a fine of up to S$200,000.
Persons found guilty of loanshark harassment may be fined at least S$4,000 and up to S$40,000, or jailed up to three years, or both.
They could also be caned if any damage to property or hurt to persons was caused while committing the acts of harassment.
- CNA/yb
From ChannelNewsAsia.com; see the source article here.
Posted by PrfyVdlx at 7:18 AM
Labels: Arrest, Criminal Investigation Department, Law, Law Enforcement, Mobile phone, Police, Police Intelligence Department, United States comments (0)
Sunday, June 7, 2009
The great Internet divide
Image via Wikipedia
An area where parents should be fully aware of, especially if their kids are very active in the online world. Personal and private information can be easily given to unscrupulous users prowling the world wide web…
----------
SURFING THE NET
by Alicia Wong
05:55 AM Jun 05, 2009
THE extent by which parents underestimate their children's use of the Internet appears to have "increased significantly" over the years, noted chairman of the Internet and Media Advisory Committee Eugene Seow.
A 2001 poll by the now-disbanded Parents Advisory Group for the Internet had found youth spending 11.4 hours a week online, while parents estimated their usage at 8.6 hours.
But a local survey by Symantec revealed yesterday that teens spent nearly twice as much time online as their parents believed. They assume children only access the Internet at home, explained Symantec's consumer business lead of the Asia South Region, Mr Effendy Ibrahim.
The findings show "parents do not have quite a good handle in terms of where their kids are online", he noted, highlighting the dangers youth face, such as cyber-bullying and security threats.
But do parents need to know everything their children get up to online in order to protect them? Nearly four in 10 admitted to spying on their kids' online usage, while 46 per cent have installed parental control software.
WHAT PARENTS THINK | WHAT KIDS ARE REALLY DOING |
61% claim to know what their kid is looking at online | Increasingly accessing the Net at Internet cafés, friend's place, via mobile phones |
2% think their kids access illegal/unlicensed materials | 25% actually do access illegal/unlicensed materials |
98% don't know if their kids access pornography | 20% of teens do access pornography |
74% aren't aware their kids chat with strangers | 48% chat with strangers online more than once a week |
90% are unaware if their kids share personal details online | 43% are careless with their personal details online |
Symantec survey conducted in April and Ma y of 397 adults and 35 teens aged 15 to 19
Parent can set rules for Internet usage even if they have limited knowledge of the Internet, said Mr Effendy, citing a free online tool (up until 2010) for parents by Symantec.
Director of Hougang Sheng Hong Family Service Centre (FSC) Sara Tan said: "(Youth need) space for secrecy ... They may not tell you everything, but it's important to open up the channels for communication."
Parents can join support groups, such as one at Hougang Sheng Hong FSC, to understand children's interest in the Web.
Youth can also register at a website that records the sites they surf and send it to a chosen "accountability person", said senior executive social worker Ong Ai Weig, from Fei Yue FSC.
But putting matters into perspective, she noted that while it is "very common" for youth to give personal information online and meet up with online pals, "the majority exercise discretion (and) are pretty street smart".
In her experience, out of 10 youth, only one or less would "get into serious problems".
From TODAY, News – Friday, 05-Jun-2009; see the source article here.
Posted by PrfyVdlx at 10:47 PM
Labels: Child Safety, Cyber-bullying, Kids and Teens, Mobile phone, Parental Control, Symantec, Website, World Wide Web comments (0)